This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
I ran the test case with arm-none-linux-gnueabi (i.e, without your iwmmxt patch), the result is almost the same as arm-iwmmxt-linux-gnueabi. There are also 60 FAIL results.
Below is the result of arm-none-eabi-gcc from GCC testresults mailing list, it only has 4 FAIL results. Since they are both "none eabi" tool chain, I think the reason is not due to iWMMXt case. I noticed the target of testing arm-none-eabi-gcc is arm-sim. I don't know if this is the cause. I used a xscale DVK to do the remote test.
Running target arm-sim FAIL: gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1 c_compat_x_tst.o compile FAIL: gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1 c_compat_y_tst.o compile UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1 c_compat_x_tst.o-c_compat_y_tst.o link UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1 c_compat_x_tst.o-c_compat_y_tst.o execute FAIL: gcc.dg/tls/alias-1.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/tls/opt-2.c (test for excess errors)
# of expected passes 37065 # of unexpected failures 4 # of expected failures 77 # of unresolved testcases 2 # of untested testcases 28 # of unsupported tests 344 /scratch/gcc/nightly-2006-05-24-4.1/arm-none-eabi/build_gcc/install/bin/arm-none-eabi-gcc version 4.1.1 20060524 (prerelease)
-- best regards, -Bridge
Hi Bridge. I suspect it just hasn't been tested and the bug fixes missed the iWMMXt case. I haven't run the test suite, I should have done really...
Steve
-- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |