This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 11:20, Martin Guy wrote: > On 5/18/06, Creech, Matthew L <MatthewLCreech@eaton.com> wrote: > > I'm using a 2.6.16 kernel on an AT91 ARM board. With all the positive > > reports recently of people using gcc-4/EABI/NTPL, I decided to make a > > clean break and try my luck with a new toolchain. > > > This toolchain produced a [seemingly] working kernel, but the system > > would hang after "freeing init memory". > > People are getting this when using ARMv4t processors, which seem to be > used in almost all current system-on-chip devices. Currently EABI only > works with ARMv5t CPUs, since thumb interwork support for armv4t is > incomplete in the gcc-4.1.0 release. We are all hoping this will be > fixed in 4.1.1 > > Ah, I just checked: your Atmel chips have an ARM7TDMI core, which is ARMv4. the 7tdmi is v4t, not v4. As long as you stick to using ARM code your application, there's no reason that I know of why the EABI system won't work (from a compiler perspective). If you believe there is a problem with the compiler, then please file a GCC bug report. The problem with Thumb support is not really in the compiler, but in the linker, and comes from the difficulty in doing interworking in the PLT veneers. To solve this, all routines in shared libraries (and any in an application that can be called directly from a shared library) need wrapping with ARM code sequences. I don't believe the linker can do this at this time. R. -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |