This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Dann, All, Quoting Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com>: > On 2/20/06, Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> wrote: > > Well. "C" seems to be the locale of choice, but unfortunately, some patches > > were not ordered with the C locale when created, but with some en_* locale > > (must be en_US, I guess). > Really? Got an example? Yep. Those two files (from the buildroot repos for gcc-3.4.4) are correctly ordered with en_US (shown below), but are incorrectly ordered with the C locale: 601-gcc34-arm-ldm.patch 601-gcc34-arm-ldm-peephole2.patch And of course, they won't apply if inversed. They already are present in the uClibc patch I submitted mid-2005. > > I think we should try every build possible, using the C locale, and look at > > those builds which fail. For those, set the locale to en_US, and try them > > again. For those that still fail, then we have a problem, because we don't > > know how they possibly were created. > You scare me :-) I knew you'd be. ;-] But we must ensure at least that all _existing_ patches apply fine, with the locale we choose to enable by default. > > So the best option IMHO is to use a series file, and fall back to using > > file sorting for directories that don't have such a file. > That's what we plan to do. Yes, I've seen the messages. But I was seconding this. > > I will have a look at ct-0.40 when I have time (probably tonight (GMT+1)). > It's not out yet! Oh. I mis-understood obne of your mail stating 0.40 wasout and a test-bed before gcc-4.1.0 was there. Will wait, then. > > Ho, and a stupid question: is it even thinkable to one day have a front-end > > to crosstool that let's you pick the binutils, the C library, the gcc, the > > headers (kernel or sanitised), etc..., and outputs the .dat file for this > > configuration? Some kind of dialog- or mconf-based menu? > Yes, it's been proposed many times. ptxdist might even have it already. Ah. Good. Will look at it. Bah, so many things crunching me from the top of my head... :-/ Regards, Yann E. MORIN. -- Yann E. MORIN Roaming in the world... ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sourceware.org
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |