This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 01:17:34PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > --without-libs \ > > --with-newlib \ > > ive never used these options, ever (or their opposite --with-libs / > --without-newlib) well, here's a simpler question -- does the bootstrap compiler need *any* thread support at all? your previous email shows your stage1 compiler with no thread support. perhaps i'm trying too hard to hammer thread support into the bootstrap gcc for no reason. having said that, that means i better be able to build an NPTL-aware glibc in the next step with that threadless bootstrap gcc. is *that* what i should be aiming for? perhaps it's not my bootstrap step that's borked but the following glibc build step. rday ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |