This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

any point in removing dead patch directories from CT?

From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday at mindspring dot com>
To: crossgcc list <crossgcc at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 05:56:24 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: any point in removing dead patch directories from CT?

  just for aesthetics, is there any value in getting rid of some of
the patches subdirectories that seem redundant?  for example, stuff
like glibc-20040822 and others like that?

  i'm assuming that example above is a snapshot or CVS pull that's
been superseded by an actual release, is that right?  just an
observation, there are clearly a few others like that.

rday

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: any point in removing dead patch directories from CT?
  - From: Allan Clark

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]