This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

any reason not to use USE_SYSROOT?

From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday at mindspring dot com>
To: crossgcc list <crossgcc at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:42:57 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: any reason not to use USE_SYSROOT?

  working my way thru the crosstool.sh code and wondering if there is
any compelling reason not to use USE_SYSROOT?  i notice that
crosstool.sh forces "--with-sysroot" on binutils >= 2.14, and using
this also lets you build a 32->64 bit cross gcc.  given the benefits,
what would be the advantages of *not* using this?

rday

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]