This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Is a target glibc really needed to build full crossgcc?

From: Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric dot com>
To: Henrik Bechmann <HBE at delta dot dk>
Cc: crossgcc at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 14:48:27 +0200
Subject: Re: Is a target glibc really needed to build full crossgcc?
References: <OF7F3F504E.68FBF375-ONC125707C.0042C51A-C125707C.0042DF1E@delta.dk>
Reply-to: Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric dot com>

On 2005-09-14 at 14:10:25 Henrik Bechmann wrote:

> When you build a cross compiler toolchain, you have to build glibc berfore
> you can
> build the full gcc. But is the cross glibc libraries actually needed to
> build the full crossgcc,
> or is it only the glibc header files that are needed?

To let the crosscompiler actually build any executables that run on
the target, you always need at least *a* C runtime library, or
C++/Java/ObjC etc, if you turn on those languages.

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is a target glibc really needed to build full crossgcc?
  - From: Henrik Bechmann

References:
- Is a target glibc really needed to build full crossgcc?
  - From: Henrik Bechmann

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]