This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 09:41, Marius Groeger wrote: > On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > > > It probably makes no difference in 3.4 and earlier. It might have a > > small effect in later versions, but gcc doesn't really understand caches > > and their layout yet. > > CPU and Arch flags do have an effect on the instruction set available > in GAS, though, so with bad settings you may end up with a toolchain > not being able to compile (assemble) code written to control the > cache. In general, of course. But in the specific instance of arm9tdmi vs arm920t it won't change anything in gas. R. ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |