This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 03:01:09PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote: > >It seems like a logical conclusion to make that moving the code for > >non-"desktop" CPUs (whatever that's supposed to mean) to 'ports' can > >only be because of the same reason. > > Yes. But again, they won't stop other people from maintaining it. They seem to have done a pretty good job at that so far, though. If you think that it'll be easier for people to get patches in now that stuff has been moved to 'ports', I disagree. In fact, if you ask me, I think that support for these platforms is going away no matter whether anyone likes it or not. --L ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |