This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: kernel/glibc headers/gcc bootstrap circular dependencies redux

From: "Arno Schuring" <aelschuring at hotmail dot com>
To: "Mike Frysinger" <vapier at gentoo dot org>,<crossgcc at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 23:31:48 +0200
Subject: Re: kernel/glibc headers/gcc bootstrap circular dependencies redux
References: <200504082011.12060.vapier@gentoo.org> <24610462.20050409155427@andric.com> <200504091423.04390.vapier@gentoo.org>

ive personally built base gcc (C-only) w/out libc or kernel headers for:
alpha
arm / armeb
avr
hppa / hppa64
i[3456]86
m68k
mips / mips64 / mipsel / mips64el
powerpc / powerpc64 (the later now possible thanks to Khem Raj)
s390 / s390x
sh / sheb / sh4 / sh4eb / sh64
sparc / sparc64

Do these require a completely different approach from the one crosstool uses now? It will be worth it if we can completely kill the glibc-headers step. Does your approach work on all architectures for every gcc-3.x release (iow: how much have you built), or just the newer ones?

Arno

np: Red Hot Chili Peppers - On Mercury

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com

References:
- kernel/glibc headers/gcc bootstrap circular dependencies redux
  - From: Mike Frysinger
- Re: kernel/glibc headers/gcc bootstrap circular dependencies redux
  - From: Dimitry Andric
- Re: kernel/glibc headers/gcc bootstrap circular dependencies redux
  - From: Mike Frysinger

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]