ARM thumb optimization bugs

[Carlos de <carlos_desa at yahoo dot com>]

Hi

Am a bit confused regarding whether the below
mentioned was resolved/fixed or not. Could someone
clarify this?

As per bug report #10467  what seems to be a bug
optimizing arm-elf code for thumb interwork using
gcc-3.3.2 was resolved/fixed as on 2003-11-08  in
gcc-3.3.3. However a different bug report #11222 last
dated 2003-07-12 lists a similar problem for gcc-3.3
and which is listed as a NEW bug and as yet appears
unassigned and unresolved. 
Have also found mention of this elsewhere but no
solution.

Also what seems to be as confusing is that the
gcc.gnu.org  site lists gcc-3.3.4 as the latest stable
release but does not give any release notes while
there also appears to be a furthur gcc-3.3.5 release.
This is listed on some of the gcc mirrors
(australia,UK, US  checked so far ) but the main gnu
ftp site only lists gcc-3.3.4. Any reasons?
Also a mail -
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-09/msg00742.html -
regarding the release status of 3.3.5 does'nt mention
any similar bugs against this version . Hopefully this
would be the "best" version to use? have compiled this
version for smdk2410 using crosstool-0.28-rc37,
binutils-2.15, glibc-2.3.2, linux-2.6.8 without any
errors .

Thanks
Carlos 


		
___________________________________________________________ 
Moving house? Beach bar in Thailand? New Wardrobe? Win £10k with Yahoo! Mail to make your dream a reality. 
Get Yahoo! Mail www.yahoo.co.uk/10k

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com