This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Dan Kegel wrote: > Jim Tison wrote: > > But we're talking about building cross-compilers here -- the ultimate > > purpose is to move cross-compiled executables (and/or dynamic libs) to > > foreign machines of the target hw/os type. If you need to build -shared > > executables, you're really in trouble when you transport that executable > > to a foreign machine where your build & PREFIX paths are unknown. You > > _might_ get away with statically linked executables, if you can make the > > link phases work. > > No, no, that's not a problem at all; crosstool removes the absolute paths > from the shared library references. No need to build static. so it depends on the proper setting of LD_LIBRARY_PATH, then? rday ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |