re: merging uclibc support patch into crosstool

[Dan Kegel <dank at kegel dot com>]

sandeep wrote:
> > One thing that would help is if I finally got around to merging
> > http://kegel.com/crosstool/crosstool-0.28-rc36/contrib/crosstool-uclibc-0.28-rc5-ter.patch   ...
>
> had a look at that patch yesterday evening and downloaded. I am using 
> ptxdist v0.6.1 that works with crosstool-0.28-rc35 and uclibc-0.9.26 . 
> above patch involves a patch for uclibc-0.9.23. merging needs to be done 
> manually. I will look at that again, may be tonight.
>
> Here is what I was looking at (from that patch) in patching process 
> yesterday (let me know, if anything i am missing).
>
> - all.sh.diff
> - crosstool.sh.diff
> - getandpatch.sh.diff

Yes, these are the vital ones.

> - crosstest.sh.diff
> - demoptx.sh.diff
> - ptx.sh.diff
> - testhello.sh.diff (might not be needed?)

These are not as important to merge, you can skip them for the moment.
Well, testhello might be nice.

> - patches/uClibc-0.9.23/Makefiles-relocate.patch.diff (take it up to 
> 0.9.26)

I would suggest sticking with the older uClibc for the moment; can
ptxdist build with the older one temporarily?

> minor tweaking in ptxdist goes w/o saying. :-)

Heh.  Yes, once you get the other stuff out of the way, the ptx changes
are probably small by comparison...
- Dan


--
My technical stuff: http://kegel.com
My politics: see http://www.misleader.org for examples of why I'm for regime change

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com