Re: Cross-compiling toolchain default location choice

[Dan Kegel <dank at kegel dot com>]

ncrfgs wrote:
> Sorry, I'm afraid that "problems" was misleading. It was just a matter of 
> personal tastes. Since the beginning I was looking for something I could 
> have easily wrote some CRUX Pgkfile scripts from. 
>
> From this point of view, after I gave a look at both crosstool and cross-lfs, 
> I found myself more comfortable with cross-lfs. Less patches to apply 
> (actually I hadn't to patch anything at all) and few, standard scripts to 
> follow.

Less patches?  The whole point of crosstool was to have only the
bare minimum of patches, and to have just one simple script to run.
Which patches are you objecting to?  Which scripts are you objecting to?

> Furthermore, the CRUX PPC regular toolchain building scripts have a lot in 
> common with LFS so I kinda "felt at home". That's all. =) 

That's fine.   I expect that some day LFS will switch to crosstool,
though :-)

> I took /usr/${TARGET}/ as default location, I hope it will be ok.

Probably.
- Dan


--
My technical stuff: http://kegel.com
My politics: see http://www.misleader.org for examples of why I'm for regime change

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com