Re: problem with crosstool 0.28-pre28 supplied patch for gcc 3.3.[23]softfloat on ARM

[Dan Kegel <dank at kegel dot com>]

Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 04:22:05AM +0200, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
>
>
> > Any objections against the patch?  (I've not yet verified whether it
> > still does the right thing in the -mhard-float case.)
>
>
> OK, the previous patch got munged.  Try this one instead.
>
>
> --L
>
>
> diff -urN crosstool-0.28-rc28.orig/patches/gcc-3.3.2/gcc-3.3.2-arm-softfloat.patch crosstool-0.28-rc28.softfloat/patches/gcc-3.3.2/gcc-3.3.2-arm-softfloat.patch
> --- crosstool-0.28-rc28.orig/patches/gcc-3.3.2/gcc-3.3.2-arm-softfloat.patch	2004-05-30 07:45:49.000000000 +0200
> +++ crosstool-0.28-rc28.softfloat/patches/gcc-3.3.2/gcc-3.3.2-arm-softfloat.patch	2004-07-15 04:25:23.821969984 +0200
> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
>   #ifndef SUBTARGET_ASM_FLOAT_SPEC
>   #define SUBTARGET_ASM_FLOAT_SPEC "\
>  -%{mapcs-float:-mfloat} %{msoft-float:-mno-fpu}"
> -+%{mapcs-float:-mfloat} %{msoft-float:-mfpu=softfpa -mfpu=softvfp}"
> ++%{mapcs-float:-mfloat} %{mhard-float:-mfpu=fpa} %{!mhard-float:%{msoft-float:-mfpu=softfpa}} %{!mhard-float:%{!msoft-float:-mfpu=softvfp}}

...

I still haven't applied this one, but I'd like to before 0.28.
Lennert, can you dig up or create a gcc bugzilla entry for this one, too?
(I know, the last one was frustrating, but I still think it's worth it!)
Thanks,
Dan

--
My technical stuff: http://kegel.com
My politics: see http://www.misleader.org for examples of why I'm for regime change

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com