This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: crosstool and .rpm's

From: Rafael Ávila de Espíndola <rafael dot espindola at ic dot unicamp dot br>
To: crossgcc at sources dot redhat dot com, debian-powerpc at lists dot debian dot org
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:06:06 -0300
Subject: Re: crosstool and .rpm's
References: <20040316154321.9EB9C2C141@lists.samba.org> <200407292022.47286.rafael.espindola@ic.unicamp.br> <41098A9C.9090709@kegel.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Em Thursday 29 July 2004 20:39, you wrote:
> Rafael Ávila de Espíndola wrote:
> Thanks.  Are the extra patches inside your attached patch good
> enough to contribute back to gcc mainline?
> e.g. would it be sensible to do
>    mv debian/patches/glibc-2.3.2-csu-make.patch
> patches/glibc-2.3.2/glibc-2.3.2-csu-make.patch ?
Yes. In fact I have already emailed it:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/crossgcc/2004-07/msg00035.html
> - Dan
Rafael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBCkfDLlrfGJ8JUHwRAltOAJ9TWdqAkw2GU3rCTA3OExL+5+1s5wCgmgcD
qvEWRYoQbfdEmOSyV0LD0rc=
=vyUA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: crosstool and .rpm's
  - From: Dan Kegel

References:
- Re: crosstool and .rpm's
  - From: Rafael Ávila de Espíndola
- Re: crosstool and .rpm's
  - From: Daniel Kegel

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]