This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Jake Page wrote:
I found this message from a while back (like 2 months ago...):
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-05/msg01148.html
...and was wondering if you ever figured out what was going on.
Yes, I think it was gcc-3.4.1 optimizing a bit much. Here's a workaround backported from cvs to glibc-2.3.2:
http://kegel.com/crosstool/crosstool-0.28-rc26/patches/glibc-2.3.2/glibc-2.3.2-allow-gcc-3.4-nounit.patch
Er, I forgot the 2nd part of that patch: http://kegel.com/crosstool/crosstool-0.28-rc26/patches/glibc-linuxthreads-2.3.2/glibc-linuxthreads-2.3.2-allow-3.4.patch
Let us know what happens. - Dan
------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |