Re: gcc-3.4.X + glibc segfault

[Daniel Kegel <dank at kegel dot com>]

Dan Kegel wrote:
> Jake Page wrote:
>
> > I found this message from a while back (like 2 months ago...):
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-05/msg01148.html
> >
> > ...and was wondering if you ever figured out what was going on.
>
>
> Yes, I think it was gcc-3.4.1 optimizing a bit much.
> Here's a workaround backported from cvs to glibc-2.3.2:
>
> http://kegel.com/crosstool/crosstool-0.28-rc26/patches/glibc-2.3.2/glibc-2.3.2-allow-gcc-3.4-nounit.patch 

Er, I forgot the 2nd part of that patch:
http://kegel.com/crosstool/crosstool-0.28-rc26/patches/glibc-linuxthreads-2.3.2/glibc-linuxthreads-2.3.2-allow-3.4.patch

Let us know what happens.
- Dan

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com