This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 10:08:04AM +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote: > Hi, > > when compiling linux-2.6.7 with a crosstool generated > arm-softfloat-linux-gnu toolchain (3.4.0 with binutils 2.14 - 2.15 > didn't work because of this NOAPP asm problem) I get lots of warnings > like this one: > > In file included from ../include/bits/string2.h:1, > from ../string/string.h:375, > from ../include/string.h:49, > from ../linuxthreads_db/thread_dbP.h:5, > from ../linuxthreads/descr.h:43, > from ../linuxthreads/internals.h:29, > from ../linuxthreads/sysdeps/pthread/bits/libc-lock.h:27, > from ../nss/getXXbyYY.c:21, > from getgrgid.c:30: > ../string/bits/string2.h:80: warning: `packed' attribute ignored > ../string/bits/string2.h:81: warning: `packed' attribute ignored > ../string/bits/string2.h:82: warning: `packed' attribute ignored > ../string/bits/string2.h:83: warning: `packed' attribute ignored > ../string/bits/string2.h:84: warning: `packed' attribute ignored > ../string/bits/string2.h:85: warning: `packed' attribute ignored > ../string/bits/string2.h:86: warning: `packed' attribute ignored > > Any idea if this might do some harm? What could a correct solution look like? Considering arm alignment issues, you could be in for a world of fun. Wouter van Heyst ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |