Re: Patch failures using crosstool

["Dave" <dave at cc0 dot net>]

> yes.  The greps wouldn't be needed if patch were better about
> returning nonzero status on failed patches.

patch -p1 -f --dry-run

should exit 0 if applied successfully even with fuzz...else exit 1

I haven't done too much checking to see how reliable it is though...

> > If so I wonder if it is more desireable to skip the patch and continue
> > patching all that will apply to the sources or to bail out of the
> > patch/build process entirely.
>
> I'm too paranoid for that.  If anything goes wrong, it's
> totally unexpected, and who knows what will happen, so best abort.
> I don't want anyone complaining that crosstool is flaky.

Yep...I would be as well...good call.

Also, I am finally reporting success using crosstool to do a big-endian
(default) gcc-3.4.0 + glibc-2.3.2 cross for XScale - IXP425. Been fighting
it for a while...may have ended up being that arm strlen patch. I will
report in a following email for benefit of the list.

Do you know off hand whether glibc-2.2.5 needed that patch?...I will dig in
and find out but just curious if you ran across it.


Thanks!

-Dave



> - Dan
>
> -- 
> My technical stuff: http://kegel.com
> My politics: see http://www.misleader.org for examples of why I'm for
regime change
>


------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com