This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 02:37:55PM +0200, David Mentre wrote: > > From: Wouter van Heyst [mailto:wouter@vidicode.org] > > > If there are more people who needs big-endian, _please_ speak up. > > Here at Mitsubishi Electric ITE TCL, we want big endian tool chains. We are > doing network processing and big endian is the natural network ordering. > > We are working on Intel IXP2400 (XScale ARM V5TE core). > > Regarding feedback, I posted a small doc when I made the chain but I haven't > be able to follow crosstools update and test recent releases. > http://www.linux-france.org/~dmentre/doc/en/ > > The tool chain I made was more a hack than a clean toolchain as Dan et al. > work. > > So, in short, I vote for big endian. :) I second this. We[1] have systems with IXP4xx and IXP28x0 processors. Till now we've used a prebuild toolchain made by Montavista. Recently i was able to generate a toolchain using crosstool and the armeb-softfloat-linux-gnu target (gcc3.3.3/glibc2.3.2). Right now i'm setting up the enviroment for the crosstest script. A requirement we have for our IXP4xx systems is uClibc support. sincerely Frank [1] University of Applied Sciences Darmstadt (FH) ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |