This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

RE: toolchain requirements submission

From: David Mentre <Mentre at tcl dot ite dot mee dot com>
To: "'Wouter van Heyst'" <wouter at vidicode dot org>, crossgcc <crossgcc at sources dot redhat dot com>, linux-arm-toolchain at lists dot arm dot linux dot org dot uk
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:37:55 +0200
Subject: RE: toolchain requirements submission

Hello,

> From: Wouter van Heyst [mailto:wouter@vidicode.org]

> If there are more people who needs big-endian, _please_ speak up. 

Here at Mitsubishi Electric ITE TCL, we want big endian tool chains. We are
doing network processing and big endian is the natural network ordering.

We are working on Intel IXP2400 (XScale ARM V5TE core).

Regarding feedback, I posted a small doc when I made the chain but I haven't
be able to follow crosstools update and test recent releases.
  http://www.linux-france.org/~dmentre/doc/en/

The tool chain I made was more a hack than a clean toolchain as Dan et al.
work.

So, in short, I vote for big endian. :)

Yours,
david
-- 
David Mentré <mentre@tcl.ite.mee.com> - Research engineer (Ph.D.)
Mitsubishi Electric ITE-TCL / European Telecommunication Research Lab
Phone: +33 2 23 45 58 29 / Fax: +33 2 23 45 58 59 
http://www.mitsubishi-electric-itce.fr

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: toolchain requirements submission
  - From: Frank Meerkoetter

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]