This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi Dan; I'm not sure how to effectively respond as I'm not sure how meaningful this is :-( I can't provide actual code so this is a contrived minimal test case... ******************************************************************** #include <iostream> using namespace std; // GPIO Specific ARM architecture file. #include "/general/tools/gnu/arm9/gcc_3.2.1/arm-arm9-linux-gnu/sys-include/asm/arch/gpio.h" int main () { cout << AT91_GPIO_OUTPUT << endl; return 0; } ********************************************************* Hope this helps, Ken On Monday 19 January 2004 12:16, Daniel Kegel wrote: > Ken Wolcott wrote: > > I'm not sure if this is exclusively an arm-specific kernel header > > missing issue or whether it is specific to at91. One of the developers > > was unable to build his arm (at91?) specific code without adding a > > directory of arm specific header files (obtained from a 2.95.3 arm > > environment) and changing the symlink: > > > > .../arm-arm9-linux-gnu/sys-include/asm/arch-at91 > > > > modified the link "arch" to point at "arch-at91" rather > > than "arch-integrator". > > Aha. Can you send me a test file from that developer I can use to > check whether my toolchain comes with the right include files? > One that doesn't compile with the vanilla crosstool? > > > Now the code compiles -- but where is the "pristine" source of this? > > would the rmk patch > > ftp://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/armlinux/source/kernel-patches/v2.4/patch- > >2.4.21-rmk1.bz2 have this code? I suspect not, as reading this email > > > > http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2004-January/019 > >067.html > > > > So I feel like I am on the verge of success with having a > > fully-functional arm cross-compiler using crosstool (v0.25)... > > Yeah, sounds like you're close. I'll try to pay attention to the > thread you linked to. > > > Next I need to build a minimal embedded environment (ptx again?)... > > Yes, the wonderful ptxdist. You should look at its patch repository; > they may have already solved this very problem. > - Dan ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |