Re: are glibc hacks in crosstool still necesary?

[Dan Kegel <dank at kegel dot com>]

Dara Hazeghi wrote:
> --- Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com> wrote:
>
> > Generally, when bringing up a new version of gcc or
> > glibc, I start out without any patches, and bring in just
> > the ones I need as I run into the problems.  So the pile of
> > patches I end up with depends on which architectures I built
> > and tested on...
>
> A good methodology, IMHO. At the moment I'm sort of
> trying to distill as simple as possible a recipe for
> building a cross-compiler, thus my question about
> whether the extra stuff was necessary. 

Excellent - we have the same goal.   Care to review
my crosstool script and let me know if it's doing anything
silly?

Also, are you intending to run the regression tests, too?

> I may simply
> try to find a good source of prebuilt glibcs though
> too...

Good luck there.  Depends on what platforms you need, I guess,
and whether you trust other people's patching and testing habits.
- Dan


--
Dan Kegel
http://www.kegel.com
http://counter.li.org/cgi-bin/runscript/display-person.cgi?user=78045


------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com