This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
My build script, which happily built gcc-3.3.1/glibc-2.3.2, now fails with
In file included from /crosstool-0.18/build/powerpc-750-linux-gnu/gcc-3.4-20030813-glibc-2.3.2/gcc-3.4-20030813/gcc/tsystem.h:75, from /crosstool-0.18/build/powerpc-750-linux-gnu/gcc-3.4-20030813-glibc-2.3.2/gcc-3.4-20030813/gcc/crtstuff.c:62: /crosstool-0.18/result/powerpc-750-linux-gnu/gcc-3.4-20030813-glibc-2.3.2/powerpc-750-linux-gnu/include/stdio.h:138:28: bits/stdio_lim.h: No such file or directory make[1]: *** [crtbegin.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/crosstool-0.18/build/powerpc-750-linux-gnu/gcc-3.4-20030813-glibc-2.3.2/build-gcc-core/gcc' make: *** [all-gcc] Error 2
I configure the bootstrap gcc with ${GCC_DIR}/configure --target=$TARGET --host=$HOST --prefix=$PREFIX \ --with-local-prefix=${PREFIX}/${TARGET} \ --disable-multilib \ --with-newlib \ --without-headers \ --disable-nls \ --enable-threads=no \ --enable-symvers=gnu \ --enable-__cxa_atexit \ --enable-languages=c \ --disable-shared
--with-newlib used to force -Dinhibit_libc, but it looks like it doesn't in gcc-3.4. Here's the new code in gcc/configure:
# If this is using newlib, without having the headers available now, # then define inhibit_libc in LIBGCC2_CFLAGS. # This prevents libgcc2 from containing any code which requires libc # support. inhibit_libc= if { { test x$host != x$target && test "x$with_sysroot" = x ; } || test x$with_newlib = xyes ; } && test "x$with_headers" = x ; then inhibit_libc=-Dinhibit_libc fi
+ inhibit_libc= + test xi686-host_pc-linux-gnu '!=' xpowerpc-750-linux-gnu + test x = x + test xno = x
And aha, it looks like --without-headers is setting $with_headers to 'no', which is misinterpreted by the new line test "x$with_headers" = x ; then in gcc/configure. Should that be test "x$with_headers" = xno ; then or something of the sort?
-- Dan Kegel http://www.kegel.com http://counter.li.org/cgi-bin/runscript/display-person.cgi?user=78045
------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |