Re: Interpreting gcc-3.3 "make check" results

[Doug Evans <dje at transmeta dot com>]

Tom Tromey writes:
 > >>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans <dje@transmeta.com> writes:
 > 
 > Doug> The part I'm not sure of is what to specify if one .exp controls
 > Doug> several subdirs.  Ideally you'd want to be able to specify
 > Doug> "foo.exp=subdir/test.c" in case test.c appears in multiple subdirs,
 > Doug> but I'm actually not sure this is guaranteed to always work.
 > 
 > The .exp file has to take care to allow things like this, using
 > runtest_file_p.  Whether or not subdirs work depends on exactly what
 > is passed to this function (i.e., it is under control of the .exp
 > file).

You mean the .exp file _should_ take care to allow things like this.
My point was that I'm not sure all the relevant .exp's currently do this
(or perhaps whether runtest_file_p supports this).
Maybe they do now, great.  It's been a long time since I ran
the gcc testsuite on a frequent basis.

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com