This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: building for cygwin (nearly there)

From: Werner Tuchan <32768 at gmx dot net>
To: Bruce Adams <bruadams at tycoint dot com>
Cc: crossgcc at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 15:12:29 +0200
Subject: Re: building for cygwin (nearly there)
References: <C9150052B112D3119E9E0004ACA6E437A47773@tepg1.tepg.co.uk>

I just tried that as suggested. Unfortunately it didn't fix the problem.
Could the reason be the same reason (what is it?) that cygwin itself still only uses gcc 2.95.3-5 ?

What is your configuration for the second pass? It should be without '--without-headers' and maybe without '--with-newlib'. I think it should work with-newlib as well but didn't try.
Can you scan for stdlib.h. Before configuration there should be only one stdlib.h in $PREFIX\m68k-elf\include which should be identical to stdlib.h from newlib. The gcc build directory should be empty .

------
Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com

References:
- RE: building for cygwin (nearly there)
  - From: Bruce Adams

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]