This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Well, what it turns out was going on was that my glibc stuff in /lib was version 2.2.2, and I had installed 2.2.4 to /usr/local/lib. So, I just set the LD_LIBRARY_PATH to /usr/local/lib, and they all run just fine! BTW, I avoided installing them to /usr as many of the FAQ's on installing glibc said it might be a bad idea. Thanks all! You've been very helpful! Kai Ruottu wrote: > Joe Sislow wrote: > > > > > David Korn wrote: > > > > > > > It sounds like you'd be much better off with powerpc-eabi, which you *can* > > > > use with newlib. > > > > Ok, while I've been messing with other stuff, I decided to try out doing a > > powerpc-eabi build, and I get the following error types (a bunch of 'em) when > > trying to compile the bootstrap: > > --- > > powerpc-eabi-ar: error while loading shared libraries: powerpc-eabi-ar: symbol > > fnmatch, version GLIBC_2.2.3 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time > > reference > > --- > > > > My question is why it's running into GLIBC references? I specified --with-newlib > > in the configuration. Are these standard Linux libraries that it's ok to use? > > For me this sounds like having problems with your native compiler/run-time libs > installation, your compiler producing executables which needs the glibc-2.2.3 version > for your installed '/lib/libc.so.6' but your current run-time library is not version > the version 2.2.3... > > In your case I would use the 'objdump -p powerpc-eabi-ar' and look at the last lines > in the output. If this gives the 'GLIBC_2.2.3' there, you must fix your native compiler > first to use some earlier glibc. If you now link against a 2.2.3-version of 'libc.so.6', > the run-time version must be the same version. Sometimes there aren't dependencies and > the executables will work ok with older 'libc.so.6's, sometimes they don't... The > produced 'powerpc-eabi-ar' can be one of these cases... > > Cheers, Kai %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Joe Sislow Cosmodog, Ltd. ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |