This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more infromation.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: arm.h problems, et al.

To: "Daly, Jeffrey" <jeffrey dot daly at intel dot com>
Subject: Re: arm.h problems, et al.
From: Jonathan Larmour <jlarmour at redhat dot co dot uk>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 04:07:27 +0100
CC: "'crossgcc at sourceware dot cygnus dot com'" <crossgcc at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>, Andreas dot Karlsson at combitechsystems dot com
Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd.
References: <8DCFE693DDFFD111AC4100A0C9B8DB94013C19ED@hdsmsx33.hd.intel.com>

"Daly, Jeffrey" wrote:
> 
> arm.h and reload1.c apparenly get messed up when you apply the patch
> (following the eCos build directions) which leads
> to the build problems people have been experiencing with cygwin.

This was a problem in older versions of cygwin that caused grief for many
many people :-(.

The best answer I feel obliged to give is: upgrade to cygwin 1.1.2 (
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/cygwin ) and reapply the toolchain patches to
a fresh set of sources as per the eCos web site.

You can fix up the sources by hand and get them to build, but frankly the
older cygwins were just too troublesome IMHO, so it's worth upgrading
anyway.

Jifl
-- 
Red Hat, 35 Cambridge Place, Cambridge, UK. CB2 1NS  Tel: +44 (1223) 728762
"Plan to be spontaneous tomorrow."  ||  These opinions are all my own fault

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com

References:
- arm.h problems, et al.
  - From: Daly, Jeffrey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]