This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more infromation.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
From: Jeff Hammond <j.hammond@cputech.com> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 15:57:49 -0700 I have been looking at the BFD docs (thanks for the pointers) and I think that I don't need BFD support. I am only interested in making a 1750A compiler. I don't need a linker or assebler, just something that will take C and generate 1750A assembly code. We already have an assembler and we don't need a linker (at least not yet). In this case, you don't need BFD. Does this mean I don't need BFD? Is there a way to tell the configure script that I don't need an assembler or linker to keep lack of BFD (and other potential pitfalls) from tripping me up? Well, don't try to configure it. Just download gcc and compile that. Don't try to configure the binutils. Ian ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |