This is the mail archive of the cgen@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the CGEN project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: New Sanyo Stormy16 relocations


>>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans <dje@transmeta.com> writes:

  Doug> But, if approval is required, methinks binutils is a better
  Doug> place to provide approval for .opc changes (e.g. complaints
  Doug> about warnings :-).

I agree that it's a bit counterproductive to post patches to .cpu/.opc
files to the cgen list, since these are just CGEN input files.  The
cgen list can/should be used for discussing changes to cgen itself.
Since a .cpu/.opc change _can_ affect all of the applications
involved, how about sending such patches to binutils@, sid@, et al
rather then cgen@?

If we can reach an agreement, it would be a good idea to update the
MAINTAINERS file to reflect the outcome.

Ben


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]