Re: incorrect disassembly on vliw / little endian

[Patrick Macdonald <patrickm at redhat dot com>]

Doug Evans wrote:
> 
> Patrick Macdonald writes:
>  > The if-then is for vliw, big endian.  Should we not try to make it for vliw
>  > regardless of the endian?
> 
> Try to fit a arbitrary insns (<= 32 bits) for arbitrary cpus in an
> unsigned long is tricky business.
> vliw-ness here is beside the point.

Yeah, I know, I was using vliw incorrectly in those thoughts.
I can see that more thinking is required on this topic. 

Patrick