This is the mail archive of the cgen@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the CGEN project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

No code for 0-operand extracts?

To: Ben Elliston <bje at redhat dot com>
Subject: No code for 0-operand extracts?
From: Doug Evans <dje at transmeta dot com>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 10:43:31 -0800 (PST)
Cc: CGEN <cgen at sources dot redhat dot com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0012042342570.5104-100000@moshpit.cygnus.com>

Ben Elliston writes:
 > CGEN's generation of extraction code includes supporting variables for
 > extracting operands even for instructions with no operands.  This makes GCC
 > go crazy at high warning levels.  Is it easy to skip this if the instruction
 > has no operands?

You'll have to be more specific.

[one might infer this is the `attribute unused' aversion that has
been bantered about]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: No code for 0-operand extracts?
  - From: Ben Elliston

References:
- No code for 0-operand extracts?
  - From: Ben Elliston

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]