This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: ld error/warning messages


On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 08:25:02AM -0800, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 15:22 +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 04:24:22PM -0800, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> > > 
> > > It looks like the important difference is 'In function' (capital I)
> > > vs.
> > > 'in function' (lowercase i).  That is why this line is no longer
> > > getting pruned the way it did before.
> > > 
> > > We could get the GCC testsuite to prune this line with a change
> > > to prune_gcc_output in gcc/testsuite/lib/prune.exp but I am not 
> > > sure if that is what we want to do or if you meant to use a capital
> > > I in this case and the lower case i is a bug.
> > See https://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/standards.html#Errors
> > "The string message should not begin with a capital letter when it
> > follows a program name and/or file name.."
> > 
> > So yes, I meant to use the lower case "in function".  Adding the
> > program name for ld was deliberate too.
> > 
> > Hmm.
> > // Ignore additional messages on Linux/x86 with PIE
> > // { dg-prune-output "Bad value" } */
> > That one is not going to match either.
> 
> GCC does some 'automatic' pruning in addition to the prunning that is
> specifically requested via dg-prune.  If you look at
> the prune_gcc_output function in gcc/testsuite/lib/prune.exp you will
> see the line:
> 
> regsub -all "(^|\n)(\[^\n\]*: )?In ((static member |lambda )?function|member|method|(copy )?constructor|destructor|instantiation|substitution|program|subroutine|block-data)\[^\n\]*" $text "" text
> 
> I believe this prunning is done to all output before the specific
> prunning requested by dg-prune.  I copied this line and changed 'In' to
> 'in' and that made the failure go away.  I couldn't just changed the
> line because some other errors are still using 'In'
> instead of 'in'.

Patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-02/msg01535.html

-- 
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]