This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Plan for release 2.29
- From: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
- To: Antonio Diaz Diaz <antonio at gnu dot org>, binutils at sourceware dot org
- Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 09:02:32 -0600
- Subject: Re: Plan for release 2.29
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- Authentication-results: ext-mx02.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com
- Authentication-results: ext-mx02.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=law at redhat dot com
- Dmarc-filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 18C526E837
- References: <597F4296.email@example.com>
On 07/31/2017 08:45 AM, Antonio Diaz Diaz wrote:
> Dear binutils maintainers,
> (Please, CC me, as I am not subscribed).
> Tristan Gingold wrote
>> On 20/06/2017 15:00, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> gdb already uses xz compression for it's release tarballs and
>>> compressed diffs. GCC was also changed to xz compressed tarballs
>>> instead of bz2, but keeping gz compressed tarballs. Could the same
>>> be done for binutils?
>> Why not.
> Because when GCC reluctantly replaced bz2 with xz, Gerald Pfeifer
> recommended me to keep pushing the strengths and advantages of
> lzip to broaden its user base. But if binutils also starts
> offering xz tarballs, it will contribute to increase the bandwagon
> effect which, as far as I can tell, is the main reason adduced to
> switch to xz.
> Please, note that 'lzip -9' produces a tarball a 2% smaller than xz, in
> spite of lzip using half the RAM to compress and requiring half the RAM
> to decompress than xz:
> -rw-r--r-- 1 19576763 Jul 24 12:41 binutils-2.29.tar.lz
> -rw-r--r-- 1 20001232 Jul 24 12:41 binutils-2.29.tar.xz
> Therefore, I politely request you to consider using lzip instead of xz
> as the third format for binutils tarballs.
>  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-06/msg00042.html
> "And just to be clear, I actually don't like xz and I'm always annoyed
> when I run into something delivered in xz format. But xz support at the
> distro level is pretty ubiquitous at this point."
That's a quote from me. Please do not use it as a means to promote lzip
as it was never meant to be used in that manner.