This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: testsuite results, binutils-2.29 branch

On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 8:01 AM, Matthias Klose <> wrote:
> On 06.07.2017 15:57, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 5:50 AM, Matthias Klose <> wrote:
>>> Some updated test results for binutils builds from the 2.29 branch.  I'm
>>> preparing an archive test rebuild using the new binutils, but will only be able
>>> to post results starting with Jul 17. Also found that glibc-2.24 fails to build
>>> in the check target on aarch64 and arm32 with the new binutils (see PR21725).
>>> Matthias
>>> amd64:
>>> no failures
>>> i686:
>>> Running /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/ld/testsuite/ld-i386/i386.exp ...
>>> FAIL: Run pr19031
>>> FAIL: Run got1
>>> FAIL: Undefined weak symbol (-fPIE -no-pie)
>>> FAIL: Undefined weak symbol (-fPIE -pie)
>>> FAIL: Build ifunc-1a with PIE -z ibtplt
>>> Running /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/ld/testsuite/ld-i386/no-plt.exp ...
>>> FAIL: No PLT (dynamic 1b)
>>> FAIL: No PLT (PIE 1e)
>>> FAIL: No PLT (PIE 1f)
>>> FAIL: No PLT (PIE 1g)
>> Please try master branch.  It is clean for me on i686 with GCC 7 default
>> to PIE.
> yes, no failures, using GCC 6. Please could you backport the fixes to the 2.29
> branch?

Done.   Please test binutils-2_29-branch.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]