This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: testsuite results, binutils-2.29 branch
- From: Matthias Klose <doko at ubuntu dot com>
- To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- Cc: binutils <binutils at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 17:01:46 +0200
- Subject: Re: testsuite results, binutils-2.29 branch
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <60a67233-e8b5-77c9-fff8-51df89cf1bf1@ubuntu.com> <CAMe9rOq55bjyjEb_d2LM3G12BP_Pd=UiACCpqTbq=tK59bE5JA@mail.gmail.com>
On 06.07.2017 15:57, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 5:50 AM, Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com> wrote:
>> Some updated test results for binutils builds from the 2.29 branch. I'm
>> preparing an archive test rebuild using the new binutils, but will only be able
>> to post results starting with Jul 17. Also found that glibc-2.24 fails to build
>> in the check target on aarch64 and arm32 with the new binutils (see PR21725).
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>>
>> amd64:
>> no failures
>>
>> i686:
>> Running /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/ld/testsuite/ld-i386/i386.exp ...
>> FAIL: Run pr19031
>> FAIL: Run got1
>> FAIL: Undefined weak symbol (-fPIE -no-pie)
>> FAIL: Undefined weak symbol (-fPIE -pie)
>> FAIL: Build ifunc-1a with PIE -z ibtplt
>> Running /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/ld/testsuite/ld-i386/no-plt.exp ...
>> FAIL: No PLT (dynamic 1b)
>> FAIL: No PLT (PIE 1e)
>> FAIL: No PLT (PIE 1f)
>> FAIL: No PLT (PIE 1g)
>>
>
> Please try master branch. It is clean for me on i686 with GCC 7 default
> to PIE.
yes, no failures, using GCC 6. Please could you backport the fixes to the 2.29
branch?
Matthias