This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: testsuite results, binutils-2.29 branch

On 06.07.2017 15:57, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 5:50 AM, Matthias Klose <> wrote:
>> Some updated test results for binutils builds from the 2.29 branch.  I'm
>> preparing an archive test rebuild using the new binutils, but will only be able
>> to post results starting with Jul 17. Also found that glibc-2.24 fails to build
>> in the check target on aarch64 and arm32 with the new binutils (see PR21725).
>> Matthias
>> amd64:
>> no failures
>> i686:
>> Running /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/ld/testsuite/ld-i386/i386.exp ...
>> FAIL: Run pr19031
>> FAIL: Run got1
>> FAIL: Undefined weak symbol (-fPIE -no-pie)
>> FAIL: Undefined weak symbol (-fPIE -pie)
>> FAIL: Build ifunc-1a with PIE -z ibtplt
>> Running /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/ld/testsuite/ld-i386/no-plt.exp ...
>> FAIL: No PLT (dynamic 1b)
>> FAIL: No PLT (PIE 1e)
>> FAIL: No PLT (PIE 1f)
>> FAIL: No PLT (PIE 1g)
> Please try master branch.  It is clean for me on i686 with GCC 7 default
> to PIE.

yes, no failures, using GCC 6. Please could you backport the fixes to the 2.29


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]