This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [ARM] PR ld/20608
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 01:57:36AM +0200, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> On 23 September 2016 at 01:25, Alan Modra <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 04:39:30PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> >> So this patch got me wondering. If the PLT slot is so far away that we
> >> need an indirect jump to get there, why don't we clone the PLT code
> >> sequence at the veneer location? As I recall there's nothing
> >> architectural about placing all the PLT slots together, it's just more
> >> convenient to do that. We could even have the clone in Thumb-2 code if
> >> that's appropriate, so that it's compatible with tail calls.
> If there are multiple PLT slots for the same function,
> doesn't this break the uniqueness of a function pointer?
Not for powerpc64. ELFv1 doesn't need the hack of defining a function
on PLT code in an executable, and ELFv2 emits special global entry
stubs for this case. But, yes, you may need to worry about this on
Australia Development Lab, IBM