This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Difference between --oformat binary, and objcopy -O binary of --oformat elf32-i386
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 07:22:36AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> > HJ, it would be nice if x86 implemented something like elf32-ppc.c
>> > ppc_elf_unhandled_reloc to give an error at link time for all the
>> > relocs that the generic linker can't handle.
>> >
>>
>> I see:
>>
>> HOWTO (R_PPC_TLSLD,
>> 0, /* rightshift */
>> 2, /* size (0 = byte, 1 = short, 2 = long) */
>> 32, /* bitsize */
>> FALSE, /* pc_relative */
>> 0, /* bitpos */
>> complain_overflow_dont, /* complain_on_overflow */
>> bfd_elf_generic_reloc, /* special_function */
>> "R_PPC_TLSLD", /* name */
>> FALSE, /* partial_inplace */
>> 0, /* src_mask */
>> 0, /* dst_mask */
>> FALSE), /* pcrel_offset */
>>
>>
>> Can generic linker handle R_PPC_TLSLD?
>
> Nope. However, this one is a marker reloc (src_mask and dst_mask both
> 0 result in no relocation) so it is OK to ignore.
>
Can bfd_perform_relocation handle ELF relocations which aren't
one of
BFD_RELOC_64,
BFD_RELOC_32,
BFD_RELOC_26,
BFD_RELOC_24,
BFD_RELOC_16,
BFD_RELOC_14,
BFD_RELOC_8,
BFD_RELOC_64_PCREL,
BFD_RELOC_32_PCREL,
BFD_RELOC_24_PCREL,
BFD_RELOC_16_PCREL,
BFD_RELOC_12_PCREL,
BFD_RELOC_8_PCREL,
-
H.J.