This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 20 Apr 2015 17:52, Cary Coutant wrote: > > Rather than maintain two lists, re-use gold's target file to determine > > whether the current target is supported. > > > > 2015-04-20 Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> > > > > * configure.ac: Replace $target checks with gold/configure.tgt. > > * configure: Regenerate. > > I think patches to the top-level config are supposed to be committed > in the GCC tree first, then synced to the sources tree, so you should > send your patch to gcc-patches as well. This looks OK to me, but there > may have been a reason it wasn't written this way to begin with. This > needs approval from someone who can review configure patches. i suspect there isn't a reason for it. if you look at other libs in the top level script, this idiom is pretty common (in fact, i copied most of the logic from libatomic). i'll resend to the gcc-patches list. -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |