This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Could we add relative path in LDFLAGS?

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>
To: loody <miloody at gmail dot com>
Cc: "binutils at sourceware dot org Development" <binutils at sourceware dot org>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 18:10:56 -0500
Subject: Re: Could we add relative path in LDFLAGS?
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <CANudz+uRpf0AY_NvbYeGgun169K+V_0eF0M7q=NhFg=5pDEUwg at mail dot gmail dot com>

On 04 Mar 2015 06:10, loody wrote:
> When I use configure with LDFLAGS="-L../lib" to set up my local
> library, I get compile error.
> And it say cannot find the library I specify. But it will be fine if I
> use absorptive path.
> Could we add relative path in LDFALGS?

are you talking about binutils or something else ?

in binutils, we don't generally use relative paths.  everything should be based 
off one of the srcdir/builddir variables that autoconf sets up for us.
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Could we add relative path in LDFLAGS?
  - From: loody

References:
- Could we add relative path in LDFLAGS?
  - From: loody

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]