This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: nios2 as asserttion
- From: Joel Sherrill <joel dot sherrill at oarcorp dot com>
- To: Nicholas Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>, "binutils at sourceware dot org" <binutils at sourceware dot org>, Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems dot org>, "Sebastian dot Huber at embedded-brains dot de" <Sebastian dot Huber at embedded-brains dot de>
- Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 10:39:21 -0500
- Subject: Re: nios2 as asserttion
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <53FE0936 dot 6050102 at oarcorp dot com> <54005777 dot 8070903 at redhat dot com>
On 8/29/2014 5:35 AM, Nicholas Clifton wrote:
> Hi Joel,
>
>> The nios2 build of gcc 4.9.1 with binutils 2.20
> Is there a particular reason that you are using binutils 2.20 and not
> 2.24 ? I am guessing that this bug is probably fixed in 2.24. (I am
> able to build a nios2-rtem4.11 toolchain locally using 4.9 and binutils
> master sources).
This may be an interesting case for RTEMS. We have a Python based build
system now like BSD packages which fetches source and builds it. I did
NOT have the ${prefix} in my PATH but it was picked up by the RTEMS
Source Builder. The ${prefix} had an older toolset in it.
The RSB built binutils 2.24 but ${prefix} had 2.20 and I guess RSB
added the ${prefix}/bin to my PATH and gcc/as referred to 2.20.
Removing the nios2 tools that were install at ${prefix} seems to
have fixed it.
Sorry for the false alert.
> Cheers
> Nick
>
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985