This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Skip ld/lto tests if plugins is disabled for binutils?
- From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hans-peter dot nilsson at axis dot com>
- To: amker dot cheng at gmail dot com
- Cc: amodra at gmail dot com, binutils at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 05:43:26 +0200
- Subject: Re: Skip ld/lto tests if plugins is disabled for binutils?
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
> From: Bin.Cheng <amker.cheng@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 04:28:32 +0200
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 11:41 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson
> <hans-peter.nilsson@axis.com> wrote:
> >> From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@axis.com>
> >> Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 17:17:13 +0200
> >
> >> I'd rather fix up the broken pieces of "plugin support"
> >> (just there to pacify bfd's need) that actually *are* in sim
> >> already and look like they *should* pull in -ldl. See
> >> sim/common/{configure.ac,Make-common.in}; I'm looking into it.
> >
> > Looks like all that's actually needed is to regenerate
> > sim/*/configure, for example by means of "make autoconf-common"
> > in sim. Will do later; no keys here.
>
> Hi Hans-Peter,
> Any updates about this? In the meantime, what else can I do except
> disable plugins/lto through out all toolchain components? Since we
> use combined source tree and can't configure binutils and gdb
> differently. Thanks very much.
Roland McGrath committed a re-build of sim/*/config{.in,ure}
later that day. I'm guessing you haven't tried since then?
arm-eabi is fine in my autotester builds (using only --target
and --prefix options).
There are a couple of simulators suffering from fallout from the
regenerated config.in due to older configury bugs
(e.g. iq2000-elf, frv-elf, m32r-elf and powerpc-eabisim needs
special treatment), but you didn't mention any others.
brgds, H-P