This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Bug: gather/scatter accepts same registers in destination/src and index
- From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- To: Michael Zolotukhin <michael dot v dot zolotukhin at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich at suse dot com>, "binutils at sourceware dot org" <binutils at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 04:42:24 -0800
- Subject: Re: Bug: gather/scatter accepts same registers in destination/src and index
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CANtU078XuYEQ8AnKR2BQoRSSByKLAf_TrzdpjEO=4h09U524gQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <52DE438B0200007800115421 at nat28 dot tlf dot novell dot com> <20140121111627 dot GC13904 at msticlxl57 dot ims dot intel dot com> <CAMe9rOpLKpmSR-vYpOE5RS3BDn2P7PewSVh85-zTHy4ZUxXvuA at mail dot gmail dot com> <20140121135628 dot GF13904 at msticlxl57 dot ims dot intel dot com> <52DE93F00200007800115670 at nat28 dot tlf dot novell dot com> <CANtU0782E-KwJbEQf=Otvq0h+0vhLXoi2yYip0gkZdonRBVvOQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <52DE96420200007800115697 at nat28 dot tlf dot novell dot com> <CANtU07_huE8K_xvb9LNg11F9zZ5RzGO9gT_r=b9j_DVG3y1PzA at mail dot gmail dot com> <52DEA12A02000078001156E4 at nat28 dot tlf dot novell dot com> <CANtU079dG0X3dPbDV8Xhxb6aybUrmzqAxJCv4bCmG-Gf+fLVSQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAMe9rOpPbQ75ktjkBbePh7SaeC9CwsU0swa0UHes5-GL_L47bw at mail dot gmail dot com> <CANtU07_GnP3hm2eqzw6XMxF2pbDK93p5UN5ExPioR=O+QmfhpQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <CANtU07_wZe9YcD1yjsqHbzs=s-VviQk_GFh-GbG+-s2J3E3Ghg at mail dot gmail dot com>
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 11:40 PM, Michael Zolotukhin
<michael.v.zolotukhin@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi HJ, Jan,
>
>>> Please open a bug report for each issue if we will fix them
>>> separately.
> I've opened bugs [1], [2], and [3] for the reported problems. There
> are more testcases for Disp8 problem in the Jan's mail, but I think it
> could have the same root cause and could be fixed altogether. If not,
> I'll file another bugreport.
>
> Thus, the current patch solves PR16489. Is it ok for trunk?
>
> [1] https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16488
> [2] https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16489
> [3] https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16490
Please re-submit your patch with PR gas/16489 in
ChangeLog.
Thanks.
--
H.J.