This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Map ".text.hot" and ".text.unlikely" input section prefixes to separate output sections.


On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 04:52:16PM -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> Unfortunately it leaves us adding more special cases for section
>> names, which I really dislike.  Is there any happy medium?
>
> I understand the dislike, but I don't see an alternative.  We should
> have spoken up before the hot/cold support was added to gcc.  I also
> dislike the fact that -ffunction-sections can generate section names
> that match the names chosen for hot/cold sections.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24201

-- 
H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]