This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 2/6] Add opcodes support for Meta.

From: Will Newton <will dot newton at gmail dot com>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 17:15:42 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] Add opcodes support for Meta.
References: <CAFbHwiQ0Y2CAKC-+3WaQrTtWFowq_B7VP-Bu4LxTqtmiCfpmOw@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1211131703110.25659@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Joseph S. Myers
<joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> There seem to be a lot of new functions in this patch that do not have a
> comment above them explaining the semantics of the function, each
> parameter and the return value, as per the GNU Coding Standards.

Hi Joseph,

Thanks for the review. Is there a specific file that is the issue? Is
there a comparable port you would suggest that I could use as a
reference for how it should be done?

Thanks,

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] Add opcodes support for Meta.
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

References:
- [PATCH 2/6] Add opcodes support for Meta.
  - From: Will Newton
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] Add opcodes support for Meta.
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]