This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Release 2.23: Ping


On Sep 4, 2012, at 4:31 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 7:19 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Sep 4, 2012, at 5:53 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 3:51 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>>>>> On Aug 31, 2012, at 7:44 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>>>>>>> as far as I understand, aarch64 was committed in the 2.23 branch.  I'd like to thanks for doing this timely.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Is there any patch that need to be in the 2.23 release ?  Please, reply quickly as I'd like to do the release soon.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> can we get this merged to the branch (it's already in gcc and HEAD):
>>>>>> PATCH: Don't set HOST_LIB_PATH_bfd/HOST_LIB_PATH_opcodes
>>>>> 
>>>>> Can you send me the url of the commit mail ?  That would help me.
>>>> 
>>>> sorry; here you go:
>>>> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2012-08/msg00451.html
>>>> -mike (resent to all)
>>> 
>>> Done.
>>> 
>> 
>> I didn't see it on 2.23 branch.
>> 
> 
> Commit didn't show up at
> 
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-09/
> 
> since it doesn't have a commit message.

Not sure why.  I was able to find the commit message for the original commit, so I think commits that doesn't affect ld/bfd/opcodes/gas/gold/... aren't send to binutils-cvs.

Tristan.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]