This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Release 2.23: Ping
On Sep 3, 2012, at 5:06 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Sep 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>
>>> Did I miss anything?
>>
>> At least the snapshot announcement:
>>
>>>
>>> I have just created the 2.23 branch and uploded prerelease 2.22.90 at:
>>> ftp://sourceware.org/pub/binutils/snapshots/binutils-2.22.90.tar.bz2
>
> Umm...
>
>> The branch was created in July, so you need to backport all these patches.
>> I can take care of that, providing you sent me the url of the
>> binutils-cvs@ messages.
>
> Hmm, I would like to get included at least these:
>
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-07/msg00139.html
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00002.html
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00006.html
>
> (I suggest combining the above three into one; non-MIPS clean-ups from the
> second can be discarded as far as I'm concerned)
>
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00027.html
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00028.html
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00029.html
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00030.html
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00044.html
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00049.html
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00050.html
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00084.html
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00085.html
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00091.html
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00092.html
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00190.html
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00191.html
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00209.html
>
> and these would be good to have too:
>
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00045.html
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00046.html
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00047.html
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00051.html
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00052.html
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00069.html
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00086.html
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00093.html
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00106.html
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00192.html
>
> the latters including in particular test suite coverage for some of the
> changes from the first set (unfortunately the dependencies require pulling
> much more than the minimal required set). I've dropped some minor updates
> that I made in that period. Overall I worked on the submissions in the
> first half of August with the explicit intent to have them included in
> 2.23, sigh...
>
> Thanks for your offer WRT applying these -- do you have any way to
> process these messages automatically? Otherwise it might perhaps be
> easier if I replayed the original commits on binutils-2_23-branch from the
> original patches. WDYT?
Wow, that's a long set. I can process them automatically.
Thanks,
Tristan.