This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: xtensa-fsf-ld: dangerous relocation: call8: call target out of range

From: nick clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>
To: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc at gmail dot com>
Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org, Marc Gauthier <marc at tensilica dot com>, augustine dot sterling at gmail dot com, bob dot wilson at acm dot org
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 12:44:21 +0100
Subject: Re: xtensa-fsf-ld: dangerous relocation: call8: call target out of range
References: <CAMo8Bf+X1Z2=YnAT7zA4Kk36ywnvumn405L1Ui+jMcqFaROv3w@mail.gmail.com> <5005236D.3060302@redhat.com> <CAMo8BfJAnw9JCjZRr4i04PPSX-7aDTTmoPPpXHGYKEN0qD_m8A@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Max,

> thanks for your suggestion. I was trying to make a test case when I
> found that I used FSF overlay

Umm, what exactly do you mean by "overlay" ?

> from older (2.20.1) binutils. With clean binutils/gcc toolchain

kernel build passes.

Are you talking about the linker's ability to generate groups of sections that overlay each other ?

Cheers
  Nick

Follow-Ups:
- Re: xtensa-fsf-ld: dangerous relocation: call8: call target out of range
  - From: Max Filippov

References:
- xtensa-fsf-ld: dangerous relocation: call8: call target out of range
  - From: Max Filippov
- Re: xtensa-fsf-ld: dangerous relocation: call8: call target out of range
  - From: nick clifton
- Re: xtensa-fsf-ld: dangerous relocation: call8: call target out of range
  - From: Max Filippov

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]