'match_priority' problem - missing priority for ARM/MIPS/PPC

[Jason Richards <jsn dot richards at gmail dot com>]

I compiled a binutils 2.22 configured for all targets. ?I noticed a
change in binutils
target architecture recognition compared to 2.20. ?objdump no longer selects or
reports a proper list of architectures when the format encountered is
ambiguous.
I did some searching on the mail list to see this [match_priority] is
a new concept.
I solved this problem with the following patch. Did I miss something?

Thanks in advance,
~Jason

*** binutils-2.22/bfd/elf32-arm.c ? Mon Nov 21 01:29:13 2011
--- elf32-arm.c Tue Jun 26 17:37:43 2012
***************
*** 1990,1995 ****
--- 1990,1998 ----
?#define TARGET_LITTLE_NAME ? ? ? ? ? ? ?"elf32-littlearm"
?#define TARGET_BIG_SYM ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?bfd_elf32_bigarm_vec
?#define TARGET_BIG_NAME ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? "elf32-bigarm"
+ #undef ?elf_match_priority
+ #define elf_match_priority 0
+

?#define elf_backend_grok_prstatus elf32_arm_nabi_grok_prstatus
?#define elf_backend_grok_psinfo ? ? ? elf32_arm_nabi_grok_psinfo
***************
*** 15400,15405 ****
--- 15403,15410 ----
?#define TARGET_BIG_SYM ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?bfd_elf32_bigarm_vxworks_vec
?#undef ?TARGET_BIG_NAME
?#define TARGET_BIG_NAME ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? "elf32-bigarm-vxworks"
+ #undef ?elf_match_priority
+ #define elf_match_priority 1

?/* Like elf32_arm_link_hash_table_create -- but overrides
? ? appropriately for VxWorks. ?*/
***************
*** 15686,15691 ****
--- 15691,15698 ----
?#define TARGET_BIG_SYM ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?bfd_elf32_bigarm_symbian_vec
?#undef ?TARGET_BIG_NAME
?#define TARGET_BIG_NAME ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? "elf32-bigarm-symbian"
+ #undef ?elf_match_priority
+ #define elf_match_priority 2

?/* Like elf32_arm_link_hash_table_create -- but overrides
? ? appropriately for Symbian OS. ?*/