This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [RFA] leb128.h: Umm, how about int64_t?
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
- To: dje at google dot com (Doug Evans)
- Cc: gcc-patches at sourcware dot org, binutils at sourceware dot org, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 11:30:57 -0700
- Subject: Re: [RFA] leb128.h: Umm, how about int64_t?
- References: <20120523164123.099BD2461B1@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com>
dje@google.com (Doug Evans) writes:
> 2012-05-23 Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
>
> * leb128.h: #include stdint.h, inttypes.h.
> (read_uleb128_to_uint64): Renamed from read_uleb128_to_ull.
> Change to take a uint64_t * argument instead of unsigned long long.
> (read_sleb128_to_uint64): Renamed from read_sleb128_to_ll.
> Change to take an int64_t * argument instead of long long.
This is OK.
Thanks.
Ian